Delayed asphalt order pushes back reopening of Springdale’s Walnut Street |
Valley News Dispatch

Delayed asphalt order pushes back reopening of Springdale’s Walnut Street

Emily Balser
Emily Balser | Tribune-Review
Crews make repairs to damage at the intersection of Porter and Walnut streets in Springdale on Monday, July 8, 2019.

Walnut Street in Springdale is expected to remain closed through Wednesday afternoon while crews continue work to repair the street.

Carmen Canonico, head of Springdale’s roads department, said the borough wasn’t able to get the asphalt needed to finish the work on Tuesday. It expected to get the asphalt needed on Wednesday morning.

“The base coat is down,” he said. “We couldn’t get any (asphalt) topper.”

Canonico said the street should reopen Wednesday afternoon. He originally hoped to have the street reopened by Tuesday afternoon.

“It’s out of our control,” he said of the delay.

A portion of Walnut Street at the intersection with Porter Street was damaged after heavy rains Saturday caused water to get into a seam and lift and crack some of the asphalt. Crews began making emergency repairs Monday.

Canonico estimated on Monday that about 30 homes have been affected by the street’s closure. A detour has been set up using Rosa Street.

Walnut Street is a one-way street going toward the damaged end, so the borough is permitting residents to go the wrong way to access Rosa Street while the repairs are being made.

Emily Balser is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Emily at 724-226-4680, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.