Don’t look now, but Fawn is keeping an eye on illegal dumping | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Don’t look now, but Fawn is keeping an eye on illegal dumping

1662808_web1_web-fawnsign

Fawn Township is about to go high-tech in trying to combat illegal dumping in the township.

The township will employ cameras at one of several locations throughout the community where dumping has occurred, according to supervisors Chairman David Montanari and Township Secretary Pam Ponsart.

Ponsart said the set of three cameras was made available to the township by Keep Pennsylvania Beautiful, the state affiliate of Keep America Beautiful. The organizations are volunteer-based groups dedicated to improving the environment and quality of life throughout the state and the country.

“They will let you borrow these cameras for free,” Ponsart said. “It can take (photos and video) at any time. They have night vision, and they’re pretty sophisticated.

“They send the pictures to my computer, and they give you alerts on your phone so, hopefully, we’ll be able to catch some people dumping.”

Ponsart said all three cameras are deployed at one location at different angles to capture as complete a view of the illegal dumping activity as possible. They are activated by motion sensors.

The township, at the suggestion of Solicitor Steve Yakopec, will post warnings throughout the township that the township is using electronic surveillance to thwart illegal dumping.

Montanari said there are a number of places throughout the township where dumping has been going on for years.

But the township will not disclose at which site the cameras will be deployed to make would-be dumpers wary of doing the illegal activity in Fawn.

Asked if the situation has improved or gotten worse through the years, Ponsart said, “I think it’s getting worse. People don’t want to pay to dump, and that’s the bottom line.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.