Man to serve up to 14 years for DUI crash that killed Tarentum woman, teen | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Man to serve up to 14 years for DUI crash that killed Tarentum woman, teen

Chuck Biedka
1716447_web1_vnd-DrivingHomicideCass1-062519
Edward Cass III
1716447_web1_vnd-Cassvehicularhomicide-062519
Michael Zier II

A Saltsburg man who killed two people, including a Tarentum junior firefighter, in a 2017 drugged driving crash in Plum was ordered Tuesday to serve up to 14 years in state prison.

Allegheny County Judge David R. Cashman ordered Edward Leonard Cass III, 27, to serve a minimum of 7 years in connection with the Aug. 6, 2017, crash along Route 286.

Tarentum junior firefighter Michael Zier II, 17, who was preparing to start his senior year at Highlands High School, died in the crash along with his girlfriend’s mother Beth Ann Beveridge, 43, of Tarentum. Beveridge’s daughter, also in the car, was injured in the crash.

A criminal complaint filed against Cass said he had fentanyl and THC in his system when he crashed the SUV he was driving into the car driven by Beveridge.

Cass was convicted in July on five felony charges, including two counts of homicide by vehicle while driving under the influence.

Cass had been free on bond since July’s nonjury trial, but was taken into custody after the sentence was handed down Tuesday, according to Cass’s defense attorney, Patrick Thomassey.

A clerk for Cashman said Cass cried and apologized to family members of the victims during the sentencing hearing.

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chuck at 724-226-4711, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.