Father of accused New Kensington cop killer charged with threatening a witness | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Father of accused New Kensington cop killer charged with threatening a witness

Renatta Signorini
946053_web1_vnd-holtsdad
Submitted
Gregory Baucum, 48, is taken into custody Thursday, March 28, 2019, by Westmoreland County sheriff’s deputies and detectives.
946053_web1_vnd-holtsdad2
Submitted
Gregory Baucum, 48, is taken into custody Thursday, March 28, 2019, by Westmoreland County sheriff’s deputies and detectives.
946053_web1_vnd-holtsdad3
Westmoreland County Prison
Gregory Baucum

The estranged father of a man accused of killing New Kensington police Officer Brian Shaw in 2017 was arrested Thursday and accused of sending messages to a witness in his son’s case, authorities said.

Gregory Baucum, 48, is accused by police of contacting the witness Jan. 8 through Facebook.

“So u snitched on my son too, didn’t know that was u till I did my research,’” Baucum allegedly said in a message to the witness.

Baucum was taken into custody in Pittsburgh’s Homewood neighborhood and arraigned in New Kensington on felony charges of witness intimidation and retaliation against a witness. He was being held at Westmoreland County Prison on $100,000 bond.

His son, Rahmael Sal Holt, 30, of Harrison, is accused of fatally shooting Shaw on a New Kensington street after a Nov. 17, 2017, traffic stop. Holt is awaiting trial for first-degree homicide and could face the death penalty if convicted.

Police said in a criminal complaint that Baucum took a photo of the alleged victim’s February 2018 statement to police and sent it to her, posted it on his personal Facebook page and uploaded it to a closed Facebook group, according to county Detective Ray Dupilka. Baucum referred to the alleged victim as a “cheese-eater snitch,” police said.

Facebook records obtained through a search warrant show the account in question was registered to Baucum, police said. He also used Facebook’s search function to look for other witnesses in Holt’s case, police said.

Baucum told District Judge Frank J. Pallone Jr. that he intended to be represented by the public defender’s office.

He previously was acquitted of witness intimidation and other charges related to Holt’s arrest. A Westmoreland County jury deliberated a little more than an hour in June before finding him not guilty.

Prosecutors contended during trial that Baucum assaulted his girlfriend after learning she cooperated with police during the manhunt for Holt by telling them of Holt’s whereabouts in the immediate aftermath of the shooting. The victim told jurors Baucum put his hands around her neck and later pinched her nose closed and covered her mouth.

Police spent four days tracking Holt after Shaw’s death before arresting him in Pittsburgh’s Hazelwood neighborhood.

Baucum told jurors both incidents were an effort to entice the victim to have sex. He told reporters after the trial that the charges were a misunderstanding.

An April preliminary hearing is set on the latest charges.

Renatta Signorini is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Renatta at 724-837-5374, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.