Juvenile peregrine falcons spotted around region after leaving nests | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Juvenile peregrine falcons spotted around region after leaving nests

Mary Ann Thomas
Courtesy of Joe Stavish of Tree Pittsburgh
A young peregrine falcon found under the 62nd Street Bridge in Pittsburgh’s Lawrenceville neighborhood.
Courtesy of Annette Devinney
A young peregrine falcon finds a perch under the Tarentum Bridge.
Courtesy of Joe Stavish of Tree Pittsburgh
A young peregrine falcon in flight under the 62nd Street Bridge in Pittsburgh’s Lawrenceville neighborhood.

It’s a long road to become the fastest flier on earth with speeds approaching 200 mph in a dive.

But local juvenile peregrine falcons, which are designated as state-threatened, are on their way as two were spotted in the region this week after leaving their nests weeks ago.

That is a good sign because young peregrines have high mortality rates, often falling victim to flight mishaps shortly after they strike out on their own, especially in urban areas.

One was seen on a rock pile at Tree Pittsburgh in Pittsburgh’s Lawrenceville neighborhood, near what is believed to be a new nest at the 62ndf Street Bridge, while another one, looking a little wet, was spied under the Tarentum Bridge.

The Tarentum falcons raised three young this year. Pittsburgh Falconuts, a Facebook group of peregrine aficionados, confirmed the photo of one of those young falcons taken Sunday by Annette Devinney of Monroeville.

Seeing the young falcons almost a month after they have left the nest is “encouraging,” said Kate St. John, the main local monitor of peregrine falcons for the Pennsylvania Game Commission and author of the blog, “Outside My Window.”

The young birds will stay in the vicinity of their nest sites until about the end of July, according to St. John.

Although parents don’t teach their young to fly, they do teach them to hunt. As peregrines catch their prey in midair, St. John explained, “the parents will catch a bird in its talons, fly by their young as if to say, ‘Look, I’ve got something’ and will drop the prey in midair for the kids to catch.”

The young falcon under the 62nd Street Bridge may need some more practice.

“It was a clumsy flier,” noted Joe Stavish, community education coordinator for Tree Pittsburgh.

“It was standing in the far end of the parking lot, and my first concern was if it was injured,” he said.

But the bird eventually flew off to the hillside.

Given Stavish’s role as an educator, he contacted St. John and Art McMorris, peregrine coordinator for the Pennsylvania Game Commission.

There has been a history of peregrine falcon sightings and ill-fated nests at the 62nd Street Bridge, which spans the Allegheny River between Lawrenceville and Etna, but a young falcon has never been documented there, according to McMorris’ report to Stavish.

The young falcon is likely from a nest somewhere undocumented in the bridge, according to McMorris and St. John.

Stavish and Tree Pittsburgh staff will be looking hard for the parent falcons and a nest next breeding season.

For 2019, there are eight known peregrine nesting sites in the region: Oakland’s Cathedral of Learning, Tarentum Bridge, a building on Third Avenue in Downtown Pittsburgh, Westinghouse Bridge, Monaca railroad bridge, Neville Island I-79 bridge, McKees Rock Bridge and likely the 62nd Street Bridge, according to St. John.

Because of a lack of reporting, St. John and the Game Commission cannot confirm if the peregrine falcons at the Route 422 Graff Bridge on the Kittanning side produced young this year.

Mary Ann Thomas is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Mary at 724-226-4691, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.