Football field, track surfaces to be replaced at Valley High School |
Valley News Dispatch

Football field, track surfaces to be replaced at Valley High School

Brian C. Rittmeyer
Tribune-Review file photo
Burrell’s Alex Bellinotti (#24) breaks up a pass intended for Valley’s Alex Ward (#21) during their game on Friday, Oct. 13, 2017 at Valley Memorial Stadium. The Vikings won 18-13.

New Kensington-Arnold School District plans to spend more than a half-million dollars to replace the track and football field surfaces at Valley High School.

Work on the football field’s artificial surface will be done after this fall’s season, school board President Bob Pallone said. It could be done immediately after the end of the season or, if weather doesn’t cooperate, in the spring.

The school board approved paying Sprinturf nearly $320,000. The South Carolina-based company had submitted the lowest of three quotes through a state purchasing program.

The district also received three quotes for the track replacement, but chose the second-lowest bidder, New Jersey-based ATT Sports.

ATT Sports’ quote totaled about $205,000, slightly higher than the nearly $200,000 quote from Track Surfaces Co. (S&S Flooring).

Pallone said Track Surfaces proposed using a “cheaper surface” that the district does not want, and the district preferred ATT’s warranty option. He could not specify the differences in the warranties.

The track will need to be replaced before track season starts in the spring, Pallone said.

“There’s been a repair done to it that was kind of a Band-Aid,” he said.

Brian C. Rittmeyer is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Brian at 724-226-4701, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.