Former ITT Tech students eligible for loan forgiveness in new settlement |
Valley News Dispatch

Former ITT Tech students eligible for loan forgiveness in new settlement

Emily Balser
James Knox | Tribune-Review
This file photo shows the ITT Technical Institute in Robinson Tuesday Sept. 6, 2016.

Nearly 600 former ITT Tech students in Pennsylvania are eligible for $5.3 million in debt relief as part of a new settlement announced Monday by state Attorney General Josh Shapiro.

A coalition of 44 state attorneys general reached a settlement with loan company Student CU Connect CUSO that includes more than $168 million in debt relief for more than 18,000 former students of ITT Tech schools nationwide, including 570 former ITT Tech students from Pennsylvania.

The attorney general’s office said the settlement holds CUSO accountable for its participation with now-defunct ITT Tech in subjecting students to deceptive and abusive lending practices.

ITT Tech filed for bankruptcy in 2016. The company had seven campuses in Pennsylvania, including locations at the Pittsburgh Mills mall in Frazer and on Campbells Run Road in Robinson.

“ITT aggressively pressured students to take predatory loan options and deceived them about the conditions of their loans,” Shapiro said in a press release. “As a result, hundreds of Pennsylvania students were burdened with student loan debt and struggled to find jobs.”

Under the terms of the settlement, CUSO has agreed that it will forego collection of the outstanding loans. Under the Redress Plan, CUSO’s loan servicer will send notices to borrowers about the cancelled debt and ensure that automatic payments are cancelled. The settlement also requires CUSO to supply Credit Reporting Agencies with information to update credit information for affected borrowers.

The attorneys general alleged that ITT, with CUSO’s knowledge, offered students temporary credit upon enrollment to cover the gap in tuition between federal student aid and the full cost of the education. Students were supposed to pay the temporary credit before the next academic year.

The attorneys general said ITT and CUSO knew, or should have known, that most students would not be able to pay the credit. Many students complained that they thought the temporary credit was similar to a federal loan and would not be due until six months after they graduated.

They went on to say, when the temporary credit became due, ITT pressured and coerced students into accepting loans from CUSO that often carried high interest rates.

The attorneys general also claim ITT resorted to pressure tactics, such as pulling students out of class and threatening to expel them if they did not accept the loan terms. Neither ITT nor CUSO made students aware of what the true cost of repayment for the temporary credit would be until after the credit was converted to a loan.

The attorneys general said the default rate on the CUSO loans was extremely high due to both the high cost of the loans as well as the lack of success ITT graduates had getting jobs that earned enough to make repayments. The defaulted loans have continued to affect students’ credit ratings and are usually not dischargeable in bankruptcy.

Students with additional questions about the settlement can contact the Office of Attorney General’s Bureau of Consumer Protection at 1-800-441-2555 or at [email protected].

Emily Balser is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Emily at 724-226-4680, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.