Frazer to consider changing zoning ordinance to allow horses in certain large residential properties |
Valley News Dispatch

Frazer to consider changing zoning ordinance to allow horses in certain large residential properties

Madasyn Lee
Madasyn Lee |Tribune-Review
This is 2510 Butler-Logan Road, the property the couple is interested in putting horses on.
Frazer Township

A couple is interested in putting horses on a 24-acre property in Frazer and is asking the supervisors to amend the township’s zoning ordinance so they can.

Frazer doesn’t allow agricultural operations on properties within its two residential moderate density (RM) zoning districts. Keeping horses is considered as an agricultural operation.

The couple, who officials identified as David Stubbs and Mara Rice-Stubbs, want to have horses on the property located at 2510 Butler-Logan Road, which is in one of those districts.

The township supervisors will hold a public hearing and potentially vote to amend the ordinance Dec. 3. The proposed amendment would allow agricultural operations on properties larger than 15 acres as a conditional use in the RM districts.

Township Supervisor Lori Ziencik said only 25% of the properties in the RM districts are big enough to have agricultural operations.

The property that prompted the potential change is surrounded by farms.

““In the areas that are in the RM district that possibly would request to have horses or agricultural operations, there are some very large property owners that it would not affect the neighboring houses,” Ziencik said.

The Stubbs couldn’t be reached for comment.

The number of horses one could have is restricted by the size of the property. No more than one horse is allowed on the first five acres. After that, one additional horse is allowed for each additional acre.

The amendment also would require:

• Livestock and poultry must be fenced in, and any fence must be at least 10 feet away from the property line.

• No other structure or use, except a single-family house and agricultural accessory structures, like a barn, would be allowed at the site.

• If the property owner sets up a roadside stand, it can sell only items produced onsite; it would have to have 10 off-street parking places.

• Any structure such as a barn must be at least 50 feet from any residential property line.

If the amendment passes, people who fit the criteria and want to have agricultural operations on their property would need to apply for conditional use which would then need to be approved by the supervisors.

“They’ll have to meet the property requirements,” Ziencik said.

Madasyn Lee is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Madasyn at [email protected], 724-226-4702 or via Twitter.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.