Freeport Area looks to make up to $600,000 in upgrades before end of school year | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Freeport Area looks to make up to $600,000 in upgrades before end of school year

George Guido
721499_web1_web-freeportareahighschool

The Freeport Area School District has a nearly $600,000 “honey-do” list it wants to get done before the end of the school year.

The school board plans to move the money from the general fund to the capital fund and consider projects on a line-item basis. Some of the projects have been planned but put off for some time.

Among the items to be voted on are:

  • $111,000 to refurbish the senior high gym and install more efficient lighting and ceiling tiles. The school district might also look at removing the aging tiles and going with just the bare duct work on the ceiling.
  • $95,000 to install new bleachers at the senior high gym. School Director Mike Huth said that has been considered for almost 20 years.
  • $85,000 for a one-ton pickup truck to replace a 2009 Ford F-350. A blade to plow snow and a salt spreader will be utilized when necessary, besides the every day tasks for the vehicle.
  • $25,000 for a replacement lawn mower for the senior high and middle school. With the middle school, the district has considerably more grass to cut.
  • $18,000 for an air and dirt separator on the boiler system.

“All of these need to be done at some point in time,” said Business Manager Ryan Manzer.

For now, the electronic message board near the school entrance on Route 356 has been shut off because it is malfunctioning. The school board has to decide whether to move the sign because of impending work on Route 356, or simply replace the message area.


George Guido is a freelance writer.


George Guido is a Tribune-Review contributing writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.