Freeport man accused of pointing handgun at women | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Freeport man accused of pointing handgun at women

Chuck Biedka
931217_web1_web-gun6

Freeport police say they used surveillance camera video to find a man accused of pointing a loaded pistol at two women and threatening to shoot them.

The women said they saw a man, later identified by police as Michael Anthony Rivera, stumbling along a sidewalk on Fourth Street at Market Street at about 10 p.m. March 16, police Chief Jeffrey Swiklinski said.

The women told police they asked Rivera, 28, of Freeport, if he was OK but told him to back off when he acted aggressively.

The women told police Rivera then pulled a handgun from his waistband, racked the slide to chamber a round and pointed it at the women, police said. The women said he accused them of making disparaging comments about him.

Police said the women pleaded for their lives and got behind a car parked along Market Street.

“Please don’t,” the women implored. Police said one of the women told them all she could think about was, “I am going to die today.”

Police didn’t find Rivera in the neighborhood. But they used video from security cameras in the area to find the driver who dropped off Rivera along Market Street. It was that driver who identified Rivera for police, Swiklinski said.

Police say they found a 9mm handgun in Rivera’s apartment.

He is charged with carrying a handgun without a permit, making terroristic threats, assault, using lewd and threatening language, causing a hazard and public drunkenness.

Rivera was being held Monday in Armstrong County Jail after failing to post $50,000 cash bond. He is awaiting a preliminary hearing.

“This is highly unusual in Freeport,” Swiklinski said.

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chuck at 724-226-4711, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.