ShareThis Page
Gilpin volunteer firefighter honored for saving man’s life in Leechburg | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Gilpin volunteer firefighter honored for saving man’s life in Leechburg

Chuck Biedka

Gilpin firefighter Charlie Stull was having lunch at a Leechburg restaurant in August when he noticed a man who was having trouble breathing.

In seconds, the man was choking.

So Stull, 21, who also is a Gilpin supervisor, took action to save the man’s life.

“I performed the Heimlich maneuver. I learned it during firefighter training,” he said.

The abdominal thrusts expelled the piece of food the man was choking on and allowed him to start breathing again. Soon, the man’s facial color returned.

“He shook hands with me as he was leaving,” Stull said.

Stull was given the fire department’s Orbin Shaner Award late last month. The award is “presented to Gilpin volunteer firefighters who save a life even while off duty, like Stull,” fire Chief Phil McConville said.

Recipients have their names added to the award, which is on display in the fire company hall.

Orbin Shaner was the first chief for the volunteer fire company. His family helped to establish the award in the memory of the late chief.

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chuck at 724-226-4711, [email protected] or via Twitter .


1098184_web1_vnd-gilpinheimlich2-050319
Submitted
Gilpin Supervisor Charlie Stull
1098184_web1_Gilpin-Volunteer-Fire-Department
Submitted
1098184_web1_vnd-gilpinheimlich-050319
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.