Greensburg man accused of ripping off Upper Burrell employer |
Valley News Dispatch

Greensburg man accused of ripping off Upper Burrell employer

Chuck Biedka
Pieces of tungsten carbide police say a Greensburg man stole from the Upper Burrell company where he worked.

A Greensburg man is accused of stealing more than $8,000 worth of industrial metal from his Upper Burrell employer in just one month.

A video arraignment was held Friday for Jeffrey Alexander Hart, 31, of Kenneth Street, who was being held in the Westmoreland County jail.

In Hart’s arrest report, Upper Burrell police Chief Kenneth Pate said Hart was an employee of JK Tool and Die on Prominence Drive.

According to the report, company management told Hart not to work before or after his regular shift. However, records from the company’s security door show Hart’s ID was used to enter the shop 12 times after his shifts ended.

The entries happened between March 4 and April 3.

Hart is accused of taking about 340 pounds of tungsten carbide worth about $8,000 as well as more than 400 pounds of copper and 260 pounds of brass.

According to police, records show Hart took the metal a little at a time to Greco’s Scrap Inc. in East Deer. That company paid him $1,525 for pieces of carbide and $1,190 for the copper and brass.

Pate said a Greco’s employee identified photos of the metal pieces and had copies of 12 sales receipts given to Hart.

Photos of the metal appeared on the scrap theft alert system established by the Institute of Scrap Recycling Industries Inc.

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chuck at 724-226-4711, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.