Harmar officials relieved to get $157,000 grant for stream bank restoration | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Harmar officials relieved to get $157,000 grant for stream bank restoration

Emily Balser

Harmar officials have received a state grant to help remove sediment from it streams as part of complying with its state-mandated Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) plan.

The township received nearly $157,000 in state Watershed Restoration and Protection Program funding for stream bank restoration along Little Deer Creek.

“We really appreciate getting the grant money,” said Supervisor Bob Seibert. “It’s tough on budgets when you have to take your actual budget money and do this to comply with the MS4 regulation.”

The MS4 program is required by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection to reduce runoff and other waterway pollution.

Township Engineer Matt Pitsch, of Senate Engineering, said the township will have a 15% match for the grant, which equals about $28,000. The work will be done next spring.

Work will include stabilizing part of the bank along Little Deer Creek in the area of Jacoby Road with new vegetation that will prevent sediment from being carried away during high water, Pitsch said.

“It’s supposed to kind of create a living buffer where during high periods of water there’s nice roots and vegetation,” he said.

Pitsch said the problem with sediment being carried downstream is it can fill in areas that weren’t meant to be filled in and can disrupt the ecosystem and aquatic life.

Seibert said he’s been vocal in the past about his concerns with the MS4 program because individual municipalities are straining their budgets to keep up with a government-mandated program.

“It’s very helpful to get some grant money to soften the impact to our township,” he said.

Emily Balser is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Emily at 724-226-4680, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.