Harmar ordinance would set rules for cell towers, antennas | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Harmar ordinance would set rules for cell towers, antennas

Emily Balser
1099602_web1_web-harmarbuilding

The Harmar supervisors plan to vote this month on a proposed ordinance that would establish rules for installing wireless antennas and towers for 5G cellular service in township rights of way.

Supervisors will hold a public hearing prior to their regular meeting May 16 to receive resident feedback and questions and then vote on the measure.

Wireless communications companies are permitted by the Federal Communications Commission to place the antennas and towers wherever they want, but supervisors Chairman Bob Seibert has previously said municipalities can put limits on where they are installed and what they look like.

The ordinance is intended to protect residents who may live near rights of way, where towers and antennas could be installed.

The ordinance outlines provisions such as height, size, maintenance agreements and landscaping, among other things.

The township also would charge application fees ranging from $100 to $1,000 depending on the structure.

A copy of the proposed ordinance is available at the township office for residents to inspect during regular business hours.

Officials have said they expect a lot of antennas to be placed across municipalities in the next decade or so and want Harmar to be prepared when that day comes.

Emily Balser is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Emily at 724-226-4680, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.