Harrison road work costs exceed budget | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Harrison road work costs exceed budget

Brian C. Rittmeyer
Brian C. Rittmeyer | Tribune-Review
Parkway Avenue in Harrison on Thursday, March 21, 2019. The road is one of 18 the township sought bids to have resurfaced this year.

Harrison awarded two contracts for road work this year, but may not be able to afford to do all of the work.

The two contracts total $481,500, which is nearly $80,000 more than the township wanted to spend, according to township Engineer Raymond Antonelli Jr., vice president of NIRA Consulting Engineers.

A nearly $409,000 contract to resurface 18 roads was awarded to A. Liberoni of Plum. Another contract, for $72,500, was awarded to Russell Standard of O’Hara to seal coat, or “tar-and-chip,” nine alleys and lanes.

A. Liberoni’s bid is about 17 percent more than the $350,000 the township expected the road paving work to cost. Russell Standard’s bid is about 34 percent more than the $54,000 expected cost for the alley and lane work.

The contracts allow the township to add or delete work, Antonelli said.

Commissioners will have to decide if they will remove any roads from either contract, he said.

“It was clear that the board wanted to keep within the budget, but I told them they need not decide what work might be eliminated at this time,” Antonelli said.

“Between now and the time that the contracts are executed, which usually takes a few weeks for the contractor to get their bonds and other paperwork pulled together, they can make their decisions and change orders can be issued,” he said.

Brian C. Rittmeyer is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Brian at 724-226-4701, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.