Health department investigates complaints about white dust in Harrison | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Health department investigates complaints about white dust in Harrison

Brian C. Rittmeyer
1625061_web1_vnd-natronadust-091019
Brian C. Rittmeyer | Tribune-Review
White dust particles are visible on this woman’s gray car parked in her driveway on Opal Court on Wednesday, Sept. 4, 2019.

The Allegheny County Health Department is investigating complaints about a white dust in parts of Harrison.

The department has received at least five complaints since the beginning of August, according to Jim Kelly, deputy director of environmental health.

Opal Court residents have complained about white dust being found on cars and houses in the past, and at least two of the recent complaints have come from people living there.

At least three of the other complaints came from people living along nearby High Street.

Kelly described the number of recent complaints as “unusually high” and said they came from a broader area than in the past.

“We continue to gather more information and will determine the appropriate course of action once our investigation is complete,” Kelly said.

Township Manager Rich Hill said the township had not received any complaints.

Commissioners President Bill Heasley said he was unaware of the recent complaints. He recalled complaints made years ago being traced to a slag dump behind Heights Plaza.

Brian C. Rittmeyer is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Brian at 724-226-4701, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.