Health department says Harrison dust is lime |
Valley News Dispatch

Health department says Harrison dust is lime

Brian C. Rittmeyer
Brian C. Rittmeyer | Tribune-Review
Bob Cihil stands next to his pickup parked outside his home in Harrison’s Natrona Heights area on Tuesday, Sept. 10, 2019. Cihil says his vehicle has been damaged by what the Alleghey County Health Department has determined is primarily lime dust coming from Harsco Metals down the hill along the Allegheny River in Natrona.
Submitted | Bob Cihil
A white dust covers the hood of Bob Cihil’s pickup in this submitted picture. In response to complaints from Cihil and other residents, the Allegheny County Health Department has investigated and determined the substance is primarily lime coming from Harsco Metals.

The Allegheny County Health Department on Tuesday identified as lime the dust coating cars in a Harrison neighborhood and said it’s coming from a nearby company.

The department began investigating after getting complaints in August from residents on Opal Court and nearby High Street in the Natrona Heights area of the township.

“We have determined that the substance is primarily lime and its origin is Harsco Metals,” Jim Kelly, deputy director of environmental health, said Wednesday through a spokesman.

Kelly said the department is preparing an enforcement action. What that action will be was not specified.

Jay Cooney, vice president of global communications for Harsco Corp. in Camp Hill, Pa., said the company is cooperating with the county in its inquiry.

“As a matter of policy, however, we do not comment on potential agency matters,” he said.

The health department did not detail what Harsco is doing that is causing the lime dust to spread. The company has a facility along the Allegheny River in the Natrona area, down hill from the affected areas.

“We cannot provide additional details as this is an ongoing investigation,” health department spokesman Ryan Scarpino said.

Harsco Metals processes slag on the site, Cooney said.

“Slag is a byproduct of steel production, and we reclaim, recover and repurpose the slag,” he said.

Bob Cihil is one of those who complained to the health department. He has lived on High Street since the mid-1970s.

Cihil said the dust was a problem 10 years ago, and it resurfaced within the last three to four weeks. He said it tends to be a problem toward the end of the year and in the fall, when air is cooler in the morning.

“A lot of it has to do with weather conditions,” he said.

In the past, “it was to a point where you could see it coming down like a fog,” he said. “One time, it was on my truck between an eighth and a quarter of an inch thick.”

Cihil, 70, who used to detail cars, said the dust is like sand, and mildly corrosive. It has damaged his pickup, leaving fine scratches and countless spots that can’t be removed.

“My windows are stained with water spots and they will not clean,” he said. “The paint has water spots that will not come out.”

Cihil says Harsco has ignored his complaints. He believes the company would rather pay fines than fix the problem because paying fines is cheaper.

“I’m not going to move because of a problem like this,” he said. “They offered to detail my truck for me. How often are you going to do that? Eventually, there’s not going to be any paint left on that truck.”

Cihil said he wishes more of his neighbors would complain about the dust, so they can get the problem to stop.

“I just don’t want it to start again like it had been,” he said. “I can’t afford to buy a new truck every year. I think it’s ridiculous they can get away with it.”

Brian C. Rittmeyer is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Brian at 724-226-4701, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.