Heroin falls from driver’s shorts in Tarentum traffic stop | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Heroin falls from driver’s shorts in Tarentum traffic stop

Chuck Biedka

Two men face drug and other charges after police said they pulled over a car in which the men were riding Monday along Route 28 in Tarentum and found heroin and crack cocaine.

The northbound car driven by Brad E. Waldbaum, 41, of McKeesport, had been tailgating the vehicle in front of it when police initiated a traffic stop near the highway’s Tarentum exit around 8:15 p.m., according to criminal complaints filed in the case.

Waldbaum took an “inordinate amount of time to pull over” before stopping at the bottom of the Tarentum exit ramp, the complaint said.

When police asked Waldbaum to get out of the car, they said a bundle of heroin fell out of his shorts.

The criminal complaints said police found 147 bags of heroin and two bags of crack cocaine during the traffic stop, and Waldbaum told police that he was under the influence of drugs.

Police said Waldbaum told them he had conspired with the passenger, Michael John Guerrini, 44, of New Kensington, to get the drugs. Waldbaum said he agreed to drive to Pittsburgh’s East Liberty neighborhood if Guerrini arranged a deal to buy 80 bags of heroin for $640.

Waldbaum and Guerrini were charged with conspiracy, possession with intent to deliver illegal drugs and possession of illegal drugs and drug paraphernalia. Waldbaum also was charged driving under the influence of drugs and a traffic offense.

The men are scheduled to have a preliminary hearing Wednesday in front of District Judge Carolyn Bengel in Brackenridge.

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chuck at 724-226-4711, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.