Highlands awards contracts for Tarentum elementary school work | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Highlands awards contracts for Tarentum elementary school work

Brian C. Rittmeyer
1563711_web1_web-highlandselemetnary
Tribune-Review file photo
Highlands Elementary School in Tarentum

Highlands School Board awarded three contracts for work at the district’s elementary school in Tarentum.

Two of the contracts, totaling about $92,100, are for repairs to Highlands Elementary’s deteriorated clock tower.

The district will pay Marsa Inc. $60,800 for restoration work on the clock tower’s masonry and BurMac Roofing $31,282 to replace the tower’s roof.

Marsa tried to submit a proposal the first time the district sought bids for work on the clock tower, but the company’s representative arrived a few minutes after the district’s deadline and the district did not accept the company’s bid.

The district ultimately rejected both of the bids it received and sought them a second time.

Marsa submitted the lowest of four bids in the second round. Those bids were opened in July.

A $25,000 donation from businessman John Greco Jr. and his wife, Sally Greco, of Lower Burrell is helping to pay for work on the clock tower.

The school board also awarded a $7,930 contract to Baker’s Waterproofing to repair the gym floor at the elementary school.

The job will include installing a perimeter water drainage system.

The system chosen is used where there is an iron problem in the groundwater, which can cause a build up of paste or gel inside a waterproofing system and clog it, according to documentation that Baker’s Waterproofing provided to the district. The system being installed can be accessed for cleaning.

Brian C. Rittmeyer is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Brian at 724-226-4701, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.