ShareThis Page
Highlands School District residents call for transparency on school closure, budget | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Highlands School District residents call for transparency on school closure, budget

Brian C. Rittmeyer
737984_web1_-vnd-highlands1-021219
LOUIS B. RUEDIGER | TRIBUNE-REVIEW
Highlands substitute Superintendent Monique Mawhinney acknowledges that the district has room to improve and that it is work in-progress during a public meeting at Highlands High School on Monday, Feb. 11, 2019.
737984_web1_vnd-highlands4-021219
LOUIS B. RUEDIGER | TRIBUNE-REVIEW
Harrison resident Kelli Canonge voices her opinion while speaking to the Highlands School Board during a public meeting at Highlands High School on Monday, Feb. 11, 2019.
737984_web1_-vnd-highlands2-021219
LOUIS B. RUEDIGER | TRIBUNE-REVIEW
Harrison resident Laura Butler asks the school board to be more transparent during a public meeting at Highlands High School on Monday, Feb. 11, 2019.
737984_web1_vnd-highlands3-021219
LOUIS B. RUEDIGER | TRIBUNE-REVIEW
Harrison resident Justin Johnson voices his opinion while speaking to the Highlands School Board during a public meeting at Highlands High School on Monday, Feb. 11, 2019.
737984_web1_vnd-highlands5-021219
LOUIS B. RUEDIGER | TRIBUNE-REVIEW
Highland School Board President Debbie Beale (second from left) listens to residents’ concerns about the potential closing of the Highlands Support Center in Fawn during a public meeting at Highlands High School on Monday, Feb. 11, 2019.

Facing the proposed closing of a school and the possibility of a property tax increase, frustrated Highlands School District residents are demanding greater transparency and more information from the district’s elected leaders and administrators.

At a public hearing Monday, Susan Bajack of Harrison said residents were pleading for greater transparency last year, when the district reconfigured its buildings and residents were told Fawn Primary Center would not be closed.

The building became the Highlands Support Center, and houses the partial hospital program, the alternative education program, support and intervention rooms and offices, and the district’s cyber charter school. The district is now considering permanently closing it.

Where those programs and services would be relocated was not disclosed during the hearing. The district only provided a list of the school’s cost, coming to about $1.6 million including capital needs, last year’s operational expenses and employee salaries and benefits.

Several residents speaking during the hearing said they believe the district wanted to close the building last year. And, now, they believe it will be closed no matter what they say.

“Everybody here knows you’re going to close Fawn. Our opinion doesn’t matter,” Bajack said, who said residents were lied to. “This is completely ridiculous.”

Residents were irritated when they were told they could not ask questions and the school board would not engage in discussion during the hearing. The state’s school code requires a public hearing before a district can close a building. The hearing is an opportunity for residents to speak for or against the proposal.

But that discussion did take place later, at the end of the school board’s agenda planning meeting, which followed the hearing. During the agenda meeting, substitute Superintendent Monique Mawhinney and school board President Debbie Beale promised to do more to get information to residents.

“I’m big on transparency,” Mawhinney said. “We need to get better. You are being heard. Let’s get it out there and work together.”

In addition to the school closing, several residents raised concerns about the possibility of another property tax increase. The school board is set to approve a preliminary 2019-20 budget at its voting meeting on Monday .

The district increased taxes to its state limit last year and, this year, officials said the district will seek exceptions from the state that could be used to raise taxes by more than its state-imposed limit.

Resident Laura Butler called for the formation of a financial oversight committee, something Beale said no school board has.

“It’s not your money. It’s all of our money,” Butler said. “We need checks and balances.”

Bajack said property taxes are rising to the point that she can’t afford to live in the district. “You’re running us to the ground,” she said.

In response to residents’ concerns about the budget, business Manager Lori Byron said the district won’t have a proposed final budget until May. There’s no guarantee the state will grant exceptions that would allow the district to increase taxes by more than its limit but asking for them gives the district options, she said.

Resident Kristie Babinsack said residents may not oppose a tax increase if they understood how their money was being spent and what the district’s plan is. “We need more transparency,” she said.

Beale agreed with a resident who said the district is in a budget crisis.

Byron said the district is owed more than $11 million in delinquent taxes. The district is considering publicizing the names of those who owe.

Tarentum Council recently voted to publish the names of delinquent property taxpayers on the borough’s website on May 1. The borough says it’s owed about $670,000.

Resident Shawn Wolfe, who is concerned about what will happen to the Fawn school after it closes, said whatever it costs to collect the delinquent money is worth it. Saying he’s taxed “to the hilt,” Wolfe said he’s moving out of the district after his child graduates.

But, looking at their tax bills and the district’s standardized test scores, a resident who said he felt like he was paying Ruth’s Chris Steak House prices for McDonald’s food was met with applause.

Rick Geahry said Highlands needs to change its priorities to focus on education and improving test scores, which he said would entice people to want to live in the district. Those who look at the district’s scores and taxes are more likely to move to Freeport, he said.

“As a district, you have a central role in the health of a community,” he said.

Pointing to the auditorium stage, Beale cited the quality of the school’s productions and the need to promote what the district does well. But Geahry said, “This might be nice, but this doesn’t show up in a score on a realty site.”

Mawhinney acknowledged the district has work to do on improving academics.

“We have to do better by our kids,” she said. “That’s a goal. That’s my job. It’s something I recognize and it’s something I want to do.”

Brian C. Rittmeyer is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Brian at 724-226-4701, brittmeyer@tribweb.com or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.