Johnstown man accused of leading Lower Burrell police on chase |
Valley News Dispatch

Johnstown man accused of leading Lower Burrell police on chase

Chuck Biedka
File photo

A Johnstown man is accused of driving into a parked vehicle in Lower Burrell and leading police on a chase through New Kensington before he was pulled over early Saturday, police said.

Christopher Jamison, 36, also is accused of driving a vehicle without an ignition interlock device, which he is required to use because of a drunken driving conviction, police said.

Police say they first saw Jamison at Leechburg Road and Chester Drive in Lower Burrell at 3:10 a.m. He allegedly didn’t stop for police and instead took a series of streets to get to a home on Marlboro Drive in New Kensington.

Officers finally stopped him at Craigdell Road and Falcon Ridge Drive in Lower Burrell.

He is accused of driving under the influence, attempting to flee or elude police, illegally driving a vehicle without a required ignition interlock, reckless driving and numerous driving offenses.

Police filed charges Tuesday.

A preliminary hearing is scheduled in June before District Judge Cheryl Peck Yakopec.

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chuck at 724-226-4711, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.