ShareThis Page
Judge fines Lower Burrell councilman $600 for harassment, trespassing | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Judge fines Lower Burrell councilman $600 for harassment, trespassing

Madasyn Czebiniak
935817_web1_VND-Joseph-Grillo

A Lower Burrell councilman was found guilty of harassing his ex-fiancee after she said he continued to contact her after she and a police officer told him not to.

Cecelia Sharrock testified in a Turtle Creek district court Tuesday that Joseph Grillo even went to the bank where she works to return her underwear and other items on the day the two originally were set to be married.

“He brought in coats, but he also brought in my personal things,” Sharrock testified.

He was fined $600, plus court costs.

Neither Grillo nor his attorney, Stephen Yakopec Jr., appeared for the scheduled summary trial on charges of harassment and defiant trespassing before District Judge Scott Schricker in Turtle Creek.

A phone message left for Grillo wasn’t immediately returned. Yakopec declined to comment on the allegations, but said he wasn’t aware the trial was scheduled and he intends to file an appeal.

Yakopec said he asked the judge’s office for a continuance more than a week ago.

“Typically, you’re notified. You have a continuance or you don’t. I was never notified,” Yakopec said.

Sharrock filed a private criminal complaint against Grillo, 59, in February. Allegheny County Assistant District Attorney Sarah Weikart approved the complaint, sending the matter to district court.

Unlike a police criminal complaint, a private complaint must be approved by an assistant district attorney to proceed. If approved, the process is the same as if the complaint had been filed by a police officer.

Sharrock of Duquesne testified that she and Grillo broke off their engagement Oct. 14. She said she told him she no longer wanted to have contact with him.

The two had a five-hour-long text conversation in January over her engagement ring, which Grillo wanted back, Sharrock testified. The conversation then turned to the couple’s wedding rings.

On Jan. 5, the two went to the Lower Burrell police station to exchange rings, police Chief Tim Weitzel said.

Sharrock told Grillo that she wanted no further contact with him and did not want him coming to her house or her place of employment, according to Weitzel. After she left, police reiterated to Grillo that he should not contact Sharrock in any manner for any reason, and Grillo stated he understood, Weitzel said.

Sharrock reported further harassment to Lower Burrell police in January, but Weitzel said she was advised to file reports in the communities where the alleged incidents happened.

Weitzel said one of the reports was related to a Facebook friend request, while the other had to do with Grillo showing up at a bank where Sharrock worked on Jan. 19, their planned wedding day.

Another woman who works at the bank testified that Sharrock wasn’t there when Grillo showed up. She said that Grillo asked her if it would be OK if he returned Sharrock’s coat. She said Grillo came in with bags.

Sharrock said Grillo brought a bra, underwear, and a bag of things that were of no use to her to the bank. She testified she had told Grillo to burn anything he had of hers.

Madasyn Czebiniak is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Madasyn at 724-226-4702, mczebiniak@tribweb.com or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.