Jury selection begins in Armstrong sex abuse case involving former fire chief | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Jury selection begins in Armstrong sex abuse case involving former fire chief

Chuck Biedka
1273383_web1_vnd-markfeeneyWPXI-091918
WPXI-TV
Mark A. Feeney
1273383_web1_vnd-davidcroyleWPXI--91918
WPXI-TV
David John Croyle

Jury selection was scheduled to start Monday in an Armstrong County courtroom for one of the men accused of sexually assaulting a 14-year-old mentally disabled boy in 2016.

Mark Alan Feeney, 56, who was a former chief of the East Franklin Volunteer Fire Department, is accused of statutory sexual assault, involuntary deviate sexual intercourse, unlawful contact with a minor and corruption of minors.

His co-defendant, David John Croyle, 61, of Kittanning, is scheduled to go to trial in July. Croyle is a Kittanning councilman, newspaper publisher and pastor.

Aggravated indecent assault and indecent assault charges had been withdrawn against Feeney and Croyle. The attorneys representing the men could not be reached for comment.

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chuck at 724-226-4711, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.