Kiski Area School District real estate tax will remain same for next school year |
Valley News Dispatch

Kiski Area School District real estate tax will remain same for next school year


Kiski Area School District’s proposed $62.4 million budget for next school year includes no increase in property taxes.

The school district, however, would use $4.2 million in reserves to fill an anticipated budgetary shortfall.

Officials unveiled the proposed budget for the 2019-2020 school year this month. The school board is expected to vote on the preliminary budget Monday. A final budget vote would take place June 19, allowing the public 30 days to review the preliminary budget before the final budget is passed.

The proposed budget projects $58.1 million in revenues, with the rest of money coming from the district’s fund balance to close the budget gap.

The real estate tax rate for Westmoreland County property owners would remain 90.27 mills. The rate for those in Parks Township, Armstrong County, would be 46.22 mills, up from 46.17 mills under the state’s equalization process since properties are assessed at different rates for each county, but they would not be paying more in taxes.

The homestead exclusion would result in a $142.31 tax bill reduction for both counties. Business Manager Peggy Gillespie said residents who have not applied for the reduction should contact her office.

The final numbers aren’t in for the current school year’s budget, but Kiski Area could be spending less than it budgeted. That could help restore some of the fund balance needed for next school year’s spending program.

“We budget at the worst-case scenario,” Gillespie said.

The biggest portion of the proposed budget is $37.4 million for classroom instruction. Nine teachers will be at the top step of the salary level, while 13 more are approaching the top step, according to officials.

State retirement money would take an $8.4 million bite out of the budget.

School directors could seek reductions in district spending. A music teacher’s retirement could save $80,000 if no replacement is hired.

“That is an option, not a recommendation,” Superintendent Timothy Scott said.

Nineteen staff positions and three support positions have been eliminated in the past three years at a savings of $1.3 million.

The school board might be contemplating a bond refinancing as soon as October, which could bring some financial relief.

Also, the district’s teachers contract is up next year and it’s hard to predict how that might impact the budget for the 2020-21 school year.

“I get nervous about what next year looks like,” board member Jessica Johns said.

“It never gets any easier,” board member Tamra Smail said. “The next couple of years won’t be any better.”

Resident Jim Johnson thanked Gillespie for her diligence and told the school board that “the trend has to stop spending $4 million more than we’re taking in. We really have to take a look at expenditures.”

Under the proposed budget, the fund balance would be $2.6 million after next school year.

George Guido is a Tribune-Review contributing writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.