ShareThis Page
Kittanning man already on Megan’s Law list facing child rape charges | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Kittanning man already on Megan’s Law list facing child rape charges

Chuck Biedka
1097740_web1_web-courts11

All charges were held to court in a preliminary hearing for a Kittanning man accused of child rape.

Dwayne Edward Hawk, 52, is already named on the Megan’s Law list of people convicted of sex offenses.

Hawk, a lifetime reporter, is accused of raping a mentally challenged girl. Police allege the teen has has the mind of a 7-year-old.

State police say the alleged rape and related offenses happened in Manor, West Franklin and Plum Creek from last May through July.

Defense attorney Deb Yost is representing Hawk. “I have a defense. I have no comment at this time,” she said.

After Hawk’s hearing, District Judge J. Gary DeComo ordered Hawk to stand trial for rape, statutory sexual assault, two counts of indecent assault, and corruption of minors.

Hawk remains in the Armstrong County Jail in lieu of $100,000 bond.

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chuck at 724-226-4711, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.