ShareThis Page
Ford City’s Layten Bowser, 2018 Rock for Life beneficiary, dies at 7 | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Ford City’s Layten Bowser, 2018 Rock for Life beneficiary, dies at 7

Tom Davidson
| Tuesday, February 19, 2019 10:13 a.m
770825_web1_Rock-for-Life-LaytenTrio
Tribune-Review file
Twin brothers Landen, left, and Layten Bowser and cousin Beau Anthony also are best friends. Though Layten has serious health issues he embraces life with joy.

A Ford City boy who for three years battled an advanced form of nerve cancer died Sunday, Feb. 17, 2019, at UPMC Children’s Hospital in Pittsburgh.

He was 7.

Layten Bowser had been the beneficiary of the 19th Rock for Life held in August.

His mother, Angelyn Waldor of Ford City told the Tribune-Review at the time that her son made the most of his young life, even with his disease. Layten was diagnosed with stage 4 high-risk neuroblastoma with two weeks after he started kindergarten.

“He always has a smile on his face, and never complains. He does what he has to do and never questions why this happens to him,” Waldor said last year. “For him, cancer is just a word. It’s not the end of his life. It’s just stolen a small part of it, for now.”

His family did their best to let him live the life of a 7-year-old boy.

“He’s the brightest, funniest and kind boy, who loves to give hugs and high-fives,” his mother said.

Arrangements were incomplete Tuesday and are being handled by Mantini Funeral Home Inc. in Ford City.

Tom Davidson is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tom at 724-226-4715, tdavidson@tribweb.com or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.