Leechburg man accused of shooting woman in face to be released from jail while awaiting trial | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Leechburg man accused of shooting woman in face to be released from jail while awaiting trial

Chuck Biedka

A Leechburg man accused of shooting a woman in the face before shooting himself will be released from jail while he awaits trial.

Roy Edward Berry Jr., 49, was granted a $10,000 non-monetary bond Tuesday after he waived his preliminary hearing.

Berry had been in the Westmoreland County Prison since being released from the hospital and turning himself in. He doesn’t have to pay the bond unless he violates his terms of release. District Judge Cheryl Peck Yakopec told Berry he has to obey the law and not use alcohol or drugs. He also must stay away from the alleged victim and witnesses.

Yakopec accepted an agreement between the prosection and defense for Berry to stay with his son at a Leechburg address until his Westmoreland County trial is scheduled.

Berry was denied bond before he appeared for his arraignment June 18.

Police have said Berry was in a bedroom inside a Vandergrift home with a woman on May 5 when he fired a shot from a 9 mm handgun that went through the woman’s mouth. He then shot himself, according to a criminal complaint filed against him. The woman’s husband, who was in another room with their infant child at the time of the shooting, secured the gun until police arrived, the complaint said.

Berry and the woman were taken to Forbes Hospital, Monroeville. The woman, whose tongue was partially severed and had holes in both cheeks, was undergoing speech therapy as of early June, the complaint said.

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chuck at 724-226-4711, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.