Leechburg man pleads guilty to forcing boy to watch sex act | TribLIVE.com

Leechburg man pleads guilty to forcing boy to watch sex act

Rich Cholodofsky

A Leechburg man pleaded guilty Tuesday to one felony offense for forcing a teen-aged boy to watch him and an adult woman have sex two years ago.

Mark Leone, 50, formerly of Allegheny Township, was sentenced by Westmoreland County Common Pleas Judge Meagan Bilik-DeFazio to serve up to 23 months in jail and an additional three years on probation for one count of corruption of a minor. Leone will be paroled once he completes a sex offender evaluation, the judge said.

As part of the guilty plea, prosecutors agreed to dismiss charges of child endangerment, unlawful contact with a minor, indecent exposure, open lewdness and other offenses.

According to court records Leone and his girlfriend, Amanda Klingensmith, 37, of Allegheny Township were arrested after the 13-year-old boy told police he was forced to watch the couple engage in sexual activity.

Klingensmith testified against Leone at a preliminary hearing last year and said the victim had an intellectual disability and asked not to be present during the sex act.

Klingensmith, 37, is scheduled to appear in court next month for a hearing to assess the status of her pending case in which she is charged with seven offenses stemming from the incident.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.