Lenape vo-tech head hopes strong bond will continue with the school districts it serves | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Lenape vo-tech head hopes strong bond will continue with the school districts it serves

George Guido

School officials are hoping the solid bonds the Freeport Area School District has with the Lenape Vocational School continue.

Wesley P. Kuchta, Lenape’s new administrative director, spoke before the school board Wednesday night and emphasized the success Freeport Area students have had at Lenape.

“It’s important that superintendents and I have a lot of dialogue,” Kuchta said. “I want to talk about the opportunities students from Freeport have with us. Our achievement test scores are just under 90 percent, and we are evaluated by industry professionals.”

As an example, students who are taking law enforcement classes are graded by active police officers and representatives from the district attorney’s office.

Kuchta brought along two Lenape students who reside within the Freeport Area School District.

Glen Spath is a pre-engineering student and would like to get a college degree in mechanical engineering later on.

Abby Pervis is taking bio-medical technical training and would eventually like to be an oncology nurse.

Kuchta said he wanted to debunk the myth that students from schools like Lenape must go directly into industry.

“About 48 percent of our students go to a post-secondary school,” said Kuchta, a Highlands High School graduate.

Later, the school board voted to elect its president, Daniel Lucovich, to the Lenape Technical School Joint Operating Board presidency and Leechburg Area School Board member Anthony Shea as vice president.

Lenape serves students from the Freeport Area, Leechburg Area, Apollo-Ridge and Armstrong school districts.

George Guido is a freelance writer.

George Guido is a Tribune-Review contributing writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.