ShareThis Page
Lower Burrell faces expensive fix for sewer line serving half of city | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Lower Burrell faces expensive fix for sewer line serving half of city

Mary Ann Thomas
1140999_web1_web-lower-burrell

City officials will have to decide how and when it will fix a high-pressure sewage line serving half of Lower Burrell, potentially costing between $1.25 million and $1.75 million.

The milelong, high-pressure line pumps sewage from the Chartiers pump station at the bottom of Edgecliff Road up to Leechburg Road. From there, gravity allows the sewage to flow down to the Municipal Sanitary Authority of the City of New Kensington’s treatment plant.

The line, decades-old and made of cast iron, has ruptured three times in the last year, according to Kevin Lettrich, chairman of the Lower Burrell Municipal Authority.

During line ruptures, residents’ service is not disrupted.

However, raw sewage runs down Edgecliff Road and into Chartiers Creek, which the Authority reports to the state Department of Environmental Protection. The Authority’s work crews have to clean up the sewage, fix the break and sometimes haul the sewage away, according to Lettrich.

“The line is rotting out, and we will have to do something in the next six months to a year,” said Lettrich, who reported the situation to Lower Burrell Council last week.

He is asking council to add the money for the line repair to a bridge loan for the engineering work on the renovation of the Chartiers pump station. The pump station is close to 30 years old and experiencing issues such as outdated mechanical and electronic equipment, according to Scott Johnson, the city’s public works foreman.

First though, the Lower Burrell Municipal Authority will have its engineers determine the pros and cons of relining the high-pressure line, which could cost about $1.25 million, or replacing it, potentially costing $1.75 million, according to Lettrich.

With that estimate, the Authority will add in the engineering for the pump station — potentially asking for $1.5 million to $2 million total for the bridge loan. City council would have to approve the loan.

Ultimately that money will be recouped in a low-interest PennVest loan that the Municipal Authority plans to pursue.

Paying for the pump station project was already in the Municipal Authority’s long term control plan to eliminate sewage overflows. The city, along with many other municipalities, is under orders by environmental authorities to reduce or eliminate sewage overflows.

Mary Ann Thomas is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Mary at 724-226-4691, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.