Lower Burrell man ordered to stand trial for fleeing police, reckless endangerment | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Lower Burrell man ordered to stand trial for fleeing police, reckless endangerment

Chuck Biedka
1748183_web1_web-police14
1748183_web1_vnd-ChaseCourt-100219
Courtesy of the Westmoreland County Prison
Chad Ebel

A 42-year-old Lower Burrell man accused in multiple cases of fleeing police at high speed will stand trial in the latest alleged chase.

Chad Ebel of Falcon Park Road is accused of leading police on a short, high-speed chase on June 7 from Shearsburg Road to Route 56, Route 356 and then onto Melwood Road, where the pursuit was ended for public safety, police said.

He is accused of reckless endangerment for passing in no-passing zones and forcing five other vehicles off the road, according to an affidavit filed by Allegheny Township police. He also is facing 17 summary driving offenses.

Police said they initially tried to pull over the Ebel’s blue Dodge Dakota truck because it was seen passing three vehicles in a no-passing zone.

On Tuesday, he waived the charges against him in connection with the June 7 incident to court. He also waived six unrelated charges stemming from a May 19 case from Lower Burrell in which he is accused of three drug charges, resisting arrest, driving without a license and driving while his license was suspended or revoked.

According to court records, Freeport police attempted to stop Ebel in a vehicle on Sept. 11, but he didn’t stop. He is charged with felony fleeing and eluding police in that case.

State police pulled him over on Sept. 20 in Tarentum and charged him with two counts of fleeing and eluding and related charges stemming from an incident on Aug. 29. A preliminary hearing is scheduled Oct. 9.

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chuck at 724-226-4711, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.