Lower Burrell man solves mystery surrounding great uncle’s 1925 death | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Lower Burrell man solves mystery surrounding great uncle’s 1925 death

Emily Balser
1654408_web1_vnd-newheadstone03-091119
Emily Balser | Tribune-Review
Jason Devlin is shown next to the new headstone for his great uncle, Hugh Devlin.
1654408_web1_vnd-newheadstone02-091119
Emily Balser | Tribune-Review
The new headstone purchased by family members for Hugh Devlin is shown at St. Mary’s Cemetery in Shaler.
1654408_web1_vnd-newheadstone01-091119
Courtesy of Jason Devlin
Hugh Devlin is shown in the only known photo of him before he died in 1925 at 18 years old.

Jason Devlin’s family never really got over the death of his great uncle nearly a century ago.

And, making matters worse, no one in the family seemed to know any details about how Hugh Devlin died at the age of 18.

“A hunting accident” is all his family seemed to know about the death.

“Nobody knew the whole story about what happened,” said Jason Devlin, 45, of Lower Burrell.

James Devlin, Jason’s father, still remembers when his father would tell the story of Hugh’s death and how it changed the family forever.

“It was a sad story for us when we were kids and my dad told us about it,” James Devlin said. “(My grandma) never got over it.”

So, Jason Devlin set about solving the mystery and, in the process, gave his great uncle the proper tribute that had been missing all those years.

A big break came when Jason Devlin found a death certificate from the state that listed the date of great uncle’s death: Dec. 1, 1925.

From there, Jason Devlin went to the Community Library of Allegheny Valley in Tarentum to look through old microfilm of newspaper pages.

An article he found described in great detail what happened to Hugh Devlin.

“When I came across that article, I was just floored. It’s been right here this whole time and no one knew about it,” Jason Devlin said. “When I found the article, I was just yelling in the library, ‘I found it, I found it!’”

Hugh Devlin reportedly was in a canoe on the Allegheny River near Oakmont when his gun accidentally discharged and nearly severed his right arm. He was able to make it to the river bank, where he was discovered hours later and taken to the hospital before he eventually died from his injuries.

“It’s a sad story what happened,” said James Devlin. “They think that, if he would have been found earlier, he would have survived.”

Officials at the time said they believed the loss of blood and shock of the accident killed Hugh Devlin.

Jason Devlin said the family believes Hugh Devlin had been out on the river hunting geese or ducks.

After discovering the newspaper article, Jason Devlin tracked down the cemetery where his great uncle is buried. The family, who had lived in Harmar at the time of the accident, couldn’t afford a burial plot so someone else in the community donated one at St. Mary’s Cemetery in Shaler.

When Jason Devlin arrived at that plot, he found only an unmarked headstone.

The family pitched in to pay the nearly $900 to get a proper headstone that lists his name and dates of birth and death.

“It did add closure on exactly what happened to him,” Jason Devlin said. “It meant a lot to the family to get the truth out about what happened.”

James Devlin said he is happy his son took the initiative to get to the bottom of the family mystery.

“Ninety-five percent of this work was done by Jason,” he said. “I was proud of what he did.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.