ShareThis Page
Lower Burrell man, son of district judge, pleads guilty to marijuana distribution charges | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Lower Burrell man, son of district judge, pleads guilty to marijuana distribution charges

Rich Cholodofsky
1200074_web1_vnd-stephenyakopec2-101018
Courtesy of Westmoreland County Prison
Stephen Yakopec III

The son of a local district judge and nephew of Westmoreland County’s district attorney pleaded guilty Thursday to drug distribution charges.

Stephen Yakopec III, 29, of Lower Burrell, could face up to 15 years in prison when he is sentenced in about three months.

In court on Thursday, Yakopec pleaded guilty to six counts in three separate criminal cases in which he was charged with possession and distribution of marijuana.

According to court records, police arrested Yakopec following a traffic stop Aug. 1 in Murrysville, when they found 14 pounds of marijuana in his vehicle. A subsequent search of a home Yakopec shared with his girlfriend found additional drugs and empty boxes that he told police were sent to him from his drug supplier in Oregon.

He also pleaded guilty to one drug-related count in connection with a search of a Lower Burrell home in March 2018. Police said Yakopec was in the residence where 13 bags of marijuana were discovered.

The arrests came during a six-month investigation by the state’s Attorney General’s Office.

Yakopec, the son of Allegheny Township-based District Judge Cheryl Peck Yakopec and nephew of District Attorney John Peck, will remain free on an unsecured bond pending a sentencing hearing conducted later this year by Common Pleas Court Judge Tim Krieger.

Yakopec’s girlfriend, Kacy Anderson, 30, of Lower Burrell, is awaiting trial, scheduled for October, on six drug-related counts.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.