Man says in lawsuit that Arnold police beat him up, violated civil rights | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Man says in lawsuit that Arnold police beat him up, violated civil rights

Chuck Biedka
1903269_web1_WEB-pittsburgh-federal-court-building

A Verona man contends in a federal lawsuit that two Arnold officers beat him up after responding to a burglary call that he had nothing to do with in 2018.

Matthew Heyl, 28, and his attorneys filed the lawsuit Tuesday in U.S. District Court in Pittsburgh against the officers, the city of Arnold and its police chief.

Heyl’s attorneys claim that Arnold police procedures resulted in a “history of excessive force and unlawful arrests.” Heyl contends the officers violated his civil rights as he was minding his own business and working to clean and fix-up an apartment along 18th Street in Arnold.

At about 9 p.m. Feb. 27, 2018, he said he stepped outside to smoke a cigarette.

That’s when Heyl contends two Arnold officers approached him and asked about a suspected African American man armed with a handgun, according to the lawsuit. The officers were answering a 911 call in which a witness said an armed black man was trying to get into a nearby apartment, the lawsuit says.

Even though Heyl didn’t look like the suspect, the two officers pulled his arms behind his back and asked him where the gun was located, according to the lawsuit.

One of the officers “hurled Mr. Heyl over his shoulder and then threw him to the ground,” according to the suit.

Then, another officer “put Mr. Heyl into a chokehold,” the lawsuit says.

Heyl was next roughly handcuffed and searched for a gun, the lawsuit says. He remained in custody until one of the officers checked records to see if Heyl was the suspect.

Named in the lawsuit in addition to the city are former police Chief Shannon Santucci Davis, Patrolman Robert Haus and former Patrolman Wesley Biricocchi.

Santucci Davis wasn’t chief at the time of the allegations. She said Tuesday she didn’t know why she is named as a defendant.

Eric Doutt was chief on that night in 2018 and remains police chief for Arnold. Doutt said Tuesday he didn’t recall the incident.

Heyl went to an emergency room Feb. 28, 2018, because “his whole body was sore,” according to the lawsuit.

A doctor diagnosed him with strained back and shoulder muscles and knee contusions, according the suit.

There is no record of criminal charges filed against Heyl.

One of Heyl’s lawyers, Sara J. Watkins, said Heyl is white and the suspect was black.

“Simply put, it was not objectively reasonable for defendants Haus and Biricocchi to detain Mr. Heyl for any crime relating to his presence outside of the apartment building,” Heyl’s attorneys wrote in the lawsuit. “Defendants knew Mr. Heyl did not match the description of the attempted burglar.”

Haus is still an Arnold officer, and Biricocchi is working in the state Attorney General’s Office.

Arnold Mayor Karen Peconi, who is Biricocchi’s mother, wasn’t available for comment.

Arnold Solicitor David Regoli said he hasn’t seen the lawsuit and couldn’t comment.

He said Arnold will be represented by an attorney for the city’s insurance company, not him.

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chuck at 724-226-4711, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.