Meetings planned to ensure July 1 start of Allegheny Valley Regional Police |
Valley News Dispatch

Meetings planned to ensure July 1 start of Allegheny Valley Regional Police

Emily Balser

Officials from Cheswick and Springdale Township are expected to vote Thursday on the final items needed for the new Allegheny Valley Regional Police Department to begin operating on Monday.

Michael Girardi, vice president of the Allegheny Valley Regional Police Commission overseeing the department, said they will meet at 4:30 p.m. Thursday to vote on the final budget and officially hire the officers.

Springdale Township supervisors will meet at 5:30 p.m. and Cheswick council will meet at 7 p.m. to vote on the budget and give final approval to authorize the officers to operate in each municipality, Girardi said.

Girardi said the final budget is expected to be around $455,000, slightly under the original estimates made when the merger plans first began.

Girardi said the officers to be hired already are officers from Cheswick and Springdale Township.

They’ve already received the new police badges and patches and the police cars are being redone with the new name.

The new department will be headquartered in Springdale Township with a substation in Cheswick, Girardi said.

The first shift of the new department is expected to start at 7 a.m. Monday.

Emily Balser is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Emily at 724-226-4680, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.