Woman missing from Kittanning found safe, police say | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Woman missing from Kittanning found safe, police say

Madasyn Czebiniak
Katie L. Stoner, who had been reported missing from Kittanning, was found safe and sound in Lawrence County on Monday, according to police

A woman missing from Kittanning was found safe in Lawrence County, according to police.

Katie L. Stoner, 27, went to the New Castle police station Monday night to let authorities know she was OK, Kittanning police Officer Greg Koprivnak said early Tuesday.

She had been missing since 6:30 p.m. Thursday.

“She was urged to basically go speak with the New Castle police department, and she did that,” Koprivnak said.

Koprivnak said Stoner contacted her ex-boyfriend, John Eugene Colbert, and he went to Kittanning and got her. Police believe the two of them went to the New Castle area.

“She reached out to this guy, he showed up and picked her up in town, and she spent the last several days with him,” Koprivnak said. “She has no cellphone. She’s not in contact with social media. She was unaware that people were looking for her like we were.”

New Castle police said they conducted numerous interviews and traffic stops in an attempt to find Stoner and were successful.

Stoner voluntarily went to the New Castle police station. New Castle police said she was unharmed and staying at a New Castle residence.

The case is closed, and no foul play is suspected, Kittanning Borough police said.

Madasyn Czebiniak is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Madasyn at 724-226-4702, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.