Missing Lake Erie boater identified as Plum man | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Missing Lake Erie boater identified as Plum man

Chuck Biedka
1560188_web1_LakeErie3
Erie Times-News
Ohio authorities said a man missing in Lake Erie since Saturday morning is from Plum.

A man missing in Lake Erie since Saturday morning is from Plum, according to information provided by Ohio authorities.

The Ohio Department of Natural Resources identified the missing man as Raymond Burns, 58.

The agency said Burns was in a recreational fishing boat that was swamped by a squall around 9:45 a.m. The boat was in deep water north of Conneaut, Ohio, at least 10 miles offshore, according to agency spokeswoman Maureen Kocot.

Kocot said Coast Guard and firefighter search teams looked for the missing boater Saturday in rough weather, but more severe weather and large waves on the lake prevented a search Sunday.

Also, electrical service in the Asthabula and Conneaut area was out to about 30,000 people, according the fire department serving the Conneaut area.

On Monday, the weather and conditions on Lake Erie allowed authorities to resume their search.

“ODNR officers are currently conducting a recovery mission using side scan sonar,” Kocot said.

Kocot said Burns was a fisherman on a boat with three other people who were rescued by a commercial fisherman just before 10 a.m. Saturday.

ODNR identified two of the other three men as David Harris, 65, of Plum, and Thomas Burns, 63, of Enon Valley. The third man was not identified. Thomas Burns and Harris were taken to an area hospital, the agency said.

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chuck at 724-226-4711, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.