Could it happen? Study into Route 28 expressway expansion to I-80 gets funding |
Valley News Dispatch

Could it happen? Study into Route 28 expressway expansion to I-80 gets funding

Emily Balser
Construction vehicles are parked at the ramp to Route 28 northbound in Tarentum, looking toward the Natrona Heights exit.

The Armstrong County Commissioners and the Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission have received funding to conduct a feasibility study for making the Route 28 expressway a limited access highway all the way to Interstate 80.

Officials have wanted to expand Route 28 from Kittanning in Armstrong to I-80 in Jefferson County for decades and to connect them directly.

They have received $250,000 from PennDOT to identify a list of short-, medium- and long-term projects.

Commissioners Pat Fabian, Jason Renshaw and George Skamai believe an improved transportation corridor from Kittanning to I-80 could improve the region’s economy.

“This could be a very big deal for Armstrong County — it could really open up the market here,” Renshaw said in a news release.

The expansion project has been the subject of discussion since the late 1970s or early 1980s, when the initial Route 28 expressway project was completed into East Franklin. It later was continued farther across the Allegheny River and around Kittanning. It presently runs into Rayburn Township. From there north to I-80, it alternates between being a two-lane road and one that has occasional climbing lanes.

“It’s good to see it back on the table for serious discussion and to have money dedicated toward exploring options for that corridor,” Skamai said in a press release.

The project would add roughly 35 miles to the Route 28 expressway, which runs from Pittsburgh to just beyond Kittanning.

The study is expected to begin by later summer.

Emily Balser is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Emily at 724-226-4680, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.