New Kensington man who served 12 years for murder indicted on federal drug charge | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

New Kensington man who served 12 years for murder indicted on federal drug charge

Chuck Biedka
1344379_web1_vnd-NKfedindict-062819
Thomas Vaugh Kelly Jr.

A New Kensington man who served 12 years for the murder of a Duquesne student now is facing a federal drug charge.

A federal grand jury in Pittsburgh this week indicted Thomas Vaugh Kelly Jr., 33, accusing him of selling fentanyl. The indictment was handed down Tuesday.

Kelly was released from prison about a year ago.

On Jan. 10, 2004, Carma Reed, 19, of Pittsburgh’s North Side neighborhood, was a second-year student at Duquesne University who was studying business marketing and carrying a 3.7 grade-point average.

She was shot in the head while she was a passenger in car that was stopped at a stop sign on Belleau Street. Kelly allegedly drove up beside the car and opened fire because he thought someone in the car had shot at him several days earlier.

Kelly went to trial in 2006, and he accepted a plea deal offered after two key witnesses refused to cooperate with the prosecution. He received a 12- to 25-year prison sentence. The state Department of Corrections said he served 12 years and was paroled on April 27, 2018.

Federal prosecutors now allege he sold at least 10 grams of fentanyl in Pittsburgh. The charges were filed by Pittsburgh police in March, and a federal Drug Enforcement Administration investigation followed, a spokeswoman for the U.S. Attorney’s Office said.

Pittsburgh police didn’t return calls for details about the state court case.

Kelly’s attorney for the Pittsburgh case, Kenneth Jay Haber, said he wasn’t told about the federal charge.

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chuck at 724-226-4711, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.