New Kensington-Arnold reports progress in teacher contract talks |
Valley News Dispatch

New Kensington-Arnold reports progress in teacher contract talks

Brian C. Rittmeyer
Brian C. Rittmeyer | Tribune-Review
Valley High School in New Kensington on Thursday, July 25, 2019.

New Kensington-Arnold School District officials are optimistic that teachers will have a new contract before classes resume next month.

The district’s teachers have been working without a contract for almost two years. The last contract ended on Aug. 31, 2017.

At a school board meeting Thursday, Superintendent John Pallone said union and district officials last met on July 18. He called the negotiating session “productive” and “very encouraging.”

No further negotiating sessions are scheduled, he said.

Pallone said district officials are hopeful that a new contract will be in place before students return to classes on Wednesday, Aug. 28.

Phillip Cope, a spokesman for the New Kensington-Arnold Education Association, offered little comment.

“The only comment that my association will allow me to say right now is that the negotiations are ‘ongoing,’” he said.

The union represents about 160 teachers and other professionals in the district.

The school board is next scheduled to meet on Thursday, Aug. 22 — six days before classes start.

Pallone said the district is looking to fill three full-time teaching positions in art, music and special education. The openings resulted from retirements and resignations.

The starting salary is $47,700, plus benefits, according to Pallone.

“It’s not a bad job,” he said.

Brian C. Rittmeyer is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Brian at 724-226-4701, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.