New Kensington man freed after murder sentence to serve 2 years for heroin | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

New Kensington man freed after murder sentence to serve 2 years for heroin

Rich Cholodofsky
1571982_web1_GavelNewN

A New Kensington man, paroled earlier this year after serving more than two decades in prison for murder, pleaded guilty Wednesday to drug charges that stemmed from his arrest in May.

Charles Edward Jones, 40, pleaded guilty to one felony count of drug possession with an intent to deliver and was sentenced by Westmoreland County Court Judge Rita Hathaway to serve two to four years in prison. Prosecutors dropped three other offenses, including one count of a felon not to possess a firearm

Jones was arrested May 30 after police raided his North Street home and found more than 700 packets of heroin and a gun.

Jones was convicted for a murder in Pittsburgh in 1997. According to court records, he was originally charged with first-degree murder but was found guilty of a lesser charge of third-degree murder. He was sentenced in 1999 to serve 20-to-40 years in prison.

Jones was paroled in February after serving about 21 years behind bars for the murder conviction.

He is awaiting a hearing on allegations that his latest arrest violated terms of his parole.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.