New Kensington cops revive 2 men who overdosed, then charged 1 of them | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

New Kensington cops revive 2 men who overdosed, then charged 1 of them

Chuck Biedka
1507242_web1_web-paraphernalia

New Kensington police revived two men with the opioid overdose-reversal drug Narcan and then filed drug-related charges against one of them, according to a criminal complaint filed Monday.

Police said they found the men unconscious just before 8 p.m. Friday in a car parked at Sheetz on Freeport Street.

The car’s engine was running, the windows were down even though it was raining, and neither man was moving, the complaint said. The driver’s head was tilted back, while the passenger’s was tilted forward.

Police said officers administered Narcan to the men, reviving both.

Officers said they found 51 stamp bags of suspected heroin or fentanyl inside the car, according to the complaint.

Police charged the driver, James Robert Dodson, 35, of East Franklin with a felony count of possession with intent to deliver heroin, driving under the influence of drugs and illegal drug possession.

Dodson was arraigned and released on $40,000 unsecured bond. A preliminary hearing is scheduled for Aug. 22.

The other man in the car has not been charged.

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chuck at 724-226-4711, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.