New turn restrictions in effect near Riverview High School, Oakmont Bakery | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

New turn restrictions in effect near Riverview High School, Oakmont Bakery

Michael DiVittorio
904289_web1_oakmont-third-street-barrier
Michael DiVittorio | Tribune-Review
Oakmont police have a barrier on Third Street at Hulton Road between 7 to 9 a.m. and 2 to 4 p.m. to help enforce turn restrictions at the intersection near Riverview High School and Oakmont Bakery.
904289_web1_new-turn-restrictions-oakmont
Michael DiVittorio | Tribune-Review
PennDOT recently posted new “no left turn” restrictions from Hulton Road onto Third Street in Oakmont between 7 a.m. and 9 a.m. and 2 p.m. to 4 p.m. Borough police also have a barrier on Third Street during those times.

Oakmont police and Riverview School District officials said new turning restrictions along Hulton Road by the high school are making a positive impact on traffic.

“It’s been much better,” police Chief Michael Ford said Tuesday. “The school is happy with all enforcement efforts.”

Westbound motorists on Hulton Road who are headed toward Hulton Bridge now are prohibited from turning left onto Third Street from 7 to 9 a.m. and 2 to 4 p.m.

Those times coincide with existing restrictions that allow motorists on Third Street to make right turns only onto Hulton Road. The signs do not state that the restrictions are just for weekdays, meaning officers can enforce them any day during the times posted.

The new restriction allows borough police to set up a barrier on Third Street during student arrival and dismissal times.

“The no left turn in addition to a physical road ‘do not enter’ barrier has been working much better for Riverview Jr./Sr. High School drop off and pick up,” district Safety Director Bob Rizzo said. “Many people see the physical barrier, which makes people think the road is closed. In general, things have been much better as the bakery settles in.”

Motorists have ignored the right-turn-only restrictions for some time. Traffic problems were exacerbated with the Feb. 5 opening of the new Oakmont Bakery location at the intersection, even though the business has more than 100 parking spaces and two lots.

“The intersection at Hulton and Third Street has always been difficult because of the amount of traffic on Hulton Road,” bakery owner Marc Serrao said via email. “PennDOT and Oakmont are working to make the intersection safe, and we are 100 percent behind that. We have posted 13 additional signs on our property, as advised by Chief Ford to help customers navigate through.

“We encourage customers to use Sweet Street (between Third Street and Allegheny Avenue) to enter our parking lot. When exiting, our parking lot signs direct our guests to access the bridge via Allegheny Avenue. We will continue to work at making our parking situation as quick, efficient and, most importantly, safe as possible.”

Borough officials submitted a letter to PennDOT the day after the new Oakmont Bakery opened requesting the no-left-turn restriction. The state sent traffic engineers to the area and conducted a traffic study in response.

“The results of the study showed that the restriction was warranted and approved,” PennDOT spokesman Steve Cowan said via email. “We agreed to install the ‘no left turn’ signs as soon as they were received and our operations permitted.”

The signs were installed earlier this month. Those who ignore the posted restrictions and try to drive around the barrier will be subject to traffic citations for failure to obey traffic-control devices, an estimated $170 fine.

Ford said he plans to review how many tickets were issued at the intersection within the next few weeks as part of the department’s monthly report.

He has a two-word message to motorists in the area: “Pay attention.”

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Michael at 412-871-2367, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.