Newly formed Allegheny Valley Regional Police Commission to begin meeting |
Valley News Dispatch

Newly formed Allegheny Valley Regional Police Commission to begin meeting

Emily Balser

The newly formed Allegheny Valley Regional Police Commission will meet Tuesday for the first time since elected officials in Cheswick and Springdale Township approved merging the communities’ police departments.

The meeting will be held at 7 p.m. at the Springdale Township municipal building, 100 Plate Dr.

The four-member commission is made up of Cheswick Council members Michael Girardi and Kathy Gillard, Springdale Township Commissioner Shirley Redman and township resident Rick Schwartz.

Girardi said the first part of Tuesday’s meeting will be organizational in nature, including selecting a chairperson, vice chairperson, secretary and treasurer for the commission.

The second part of the meeting will dive into issues such as bookkeeping and accounting items, pensions, a logo for the new department’s uniforms and cars and who will be chief.

“We’re going in with a lot of enthusiasm and support,” Girardi said. “There’s work that needs to be done to get us to that point of being operational.”

Officials are aiming for a July 1 start date. The commission will meet on an as-needed basis until everything is finalized. Once the department is up and running, the commission likely will meet monthly, Girardi said.

Girardi encouraged the public to attend Tuesday’s meeting.

“It’ll be an opportunity to voice thoughts and concerns,” he said. “Community involvement is always appreciated.”

Officials have said the new force will cost both communities less. It will have a $500,000 budget. The borough and township had been spending a combined $672,000 on their respective forces.

Girardi said the commission also will consider several grant opportunities to help fund the department and ways it can work with the county and state to ensure a seamless transition.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.