No tax increase planned in Apollo-Ridge School District | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

No tax increase planned in Apollo-Ridge School District

1153705_web1_apollo-ridge-image
Apollo-Ridge School District

Apollo-Ridge School District’s $25.5 million preliminary budget for next school year does not include an increase in property taxes, despite a 1% increase in proposed spending over this year, officials said.

The preliminary budget unveiled Monday keeps the tax rate at 62.4 mills in the Armstrong County municipalities of Apollo, North Apollo and Kiski Township. The average homeowner in those communities would continue to pay $1,763 in property taxes.

The rate for Young and Blacklick townships in Indiana County would decrease from 14.8 mills to 14.4 mills. But the average homeowner would continue to pay $1,317 because of an equalization process used when a school district crosses county lines and there are different assessment rates.

Property owners in both counties who sign up for the homestead exclusion would see their real estate taxes reduced by $337.

It’s the third consecutive year that real estate taxes have not gone up in the Armstrong County sector of the school district.

“I think that shows another example that we’re controlling what we actually can control,” Superintendent Matthew Curci said. “We want to grow our academic programs, but we want to be good stewards of our tax dollars.”

Most spending is under contractual control, including salaries and retirement fund contributions.

There is a shortfall of about $1.4 million between projected spending and revenues, but officials said they plan to dip into the district’s $9.9 million reserve fund to make up the projected deficit.

School directors are expected to vote on the preliminary budget May 23, and a final vote is scheduled for June 24.

George Guido is a Tribune-Review contributing writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.