North Apollo opts to keep Kiski Township police coverage | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

North Apollo opts to keep Kiski Township police coverage

816389_web1_vnd-TouchATruck-090918
Tribune-Review file
North Apollo officials must decide if they want to continue to contract with neighboring Kiski Township for local police coverage.

Kiski Township will continue to supply police services to North Apollo.

North Apollo council Monday night approved a new, three-year contract in which the borough would pay Kiski Township $49,800 annually for police coverage.

That’s a hike of $3,000 per year over the five-year contract that expired last year.

Had North Apollo Council not approved or failed to act on the contract offer Monday night, the borough would have been without police coverage starting Tuesday.

Also under terms of the new pact, either municipality can opt out of the contract no later than Sept. 30 of a given year so both municipalities can adjust their budgets for the subsequent year.

The previous contract expired March 31, 2018. The new contract is in effect until Dec. 31, 2021.

At Kiski’s last supervisors meeting Feb. 13, an ultimatum was issued for North Apollo to act on a new contract offer. North Apollo had looked at neighboring Apollo and Parks Township for police coverage.

“We were just shopping around. It’s no secret, it’s in our minutes,” North Apollo council Vice President Dana Beck said. “We decided to stick with Kiski Township.”

Kiski Township Supervisor Mike Bash, head of the police committee, attended Monday’s meeting and was happy with the outcome.

Said Bash: “I’m not here to point any fingers. We’ve been serving North Apollo since 2007. I’ll back our police department 100 percent. Our police also have good rapport with the kids of both communities.”

Bash also said all were part of “the same family” in reference to both municipalities being part of the Apollo-Ridge School District and added that the $3,000 increase “was non-negotiable” because of increased costs for police salaries, equipment and pension contributions.

It was the first increase in five years, as the previous contract froze annual payments at $46,800.

Beck said North Apollo officials had received periodic complaints from residents about police coverage and felt obligated to solve constituent concerns.

Kiski police Chief Jerrod Thompson, who also attended the council meeting, suggested improvements in communication between his department and North Apollo council, particularly in following up with complaints or requests for information.

The new contract breaks down to about $4,250 per month for North Apollo.

One reason Kiski Township proposed a three-year pact instead of five years was to allow a concurrent time frame with the existing police contract in the township.

Residents who spoke Monday night before the vote praised the work police are doing.

“You’d put the whole town in jeopardy over a three thousand dollar raise?” resident Mark Boyer asked.

“I’ve never been happier with police coverage,” Joe Peters said.

The vote was 3-0 and was received by brisk applause from those who packed North Apollo council chambers.

Council members Beck, Bill Campbell and Arlene McCoy voted yes. Council President Don Acker was absent due to a family illness and Councilman James Spatafore was unable to attend.

George Guido is a Tribune-Review contributing writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.