Opening of Harmar’s Jacoby Road delayed until next year | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Opening of Harmar’s Jacoby Road delayed until next year

Madasyn Lee
1972088_web1_WEB-Road-Closed-sign-2

Wintry weather has further postponed the reopening of Harmar’s Jacoby Road, officials said Thursday.

The road has been closed since July as part of a $1.1 million bridge replacement project.

The section of road between Rosedale Road and Ecker Lane was supposed to reopen sometime this month, but the county’s Department of Public Works said it has been delayed until May of next year because certain work can’t be completed in temperatures below 40 degrees. Construction will be halted until April 1.

Carmen Paliotta Contracting Inc. is doing the work, which includes replacing a bridge that crosses over Little Deer Creek, making drainage improvements, installing guardrails and signs, paving and painting lines.

The bridge’s average daily traffic is 500 vehicles.

This isn’t the first time the project has been delayed. It was originally scheduled to start in April, but work was postponed until July to accommodate trout season. It was delayed again in October because unforeseen problems required contractors to order more materials, officials said.

Traffic will continue to be detoured using Nixon Road, Hite Road, Route 28, Route 910 and Rich Hill Road.

Madasyn Lee is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Madasyn at [email protected], 724-226-4702 or via Twitter.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.