Plum man pleads guilty to federal drug trafficking | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Plum man pleads guilty to federal drug trafficking

Chuck Biedka
1727945_web1_web-moneycash

A Plum man pleaded guilty Wednesday to federal charges of trafficking heroin, fentanyl, and cocaine.

Brandon Winters, 43, was found guilty of conspiring to distribute at least one kilogram of heroin and at least 400 grams of fentanyl and possessing at least 500 grams of cocaine with intent to sell it.

The FBI and state police on Jan. 30 searched a Pittsburgh apartment used by Winters and alleged co-conspirators, Eduard Rijo and Erick Martinez, according to prosecutors. The three were allegedly found with about 75,000 packets of mixed heroin and fentanyl and about 500 grams of cocaine. Investigators also found about $250,000 in cash.

Prosecutors are seeking to confiscate the money as well as a 2012 Porsche Panamera and a 2007 Nissan Maxima.

Rijo’s case is in the pretrial motions stage. On Wednesday, the court appointed a defense attorney for him.

On Sept. 19 ,the court granted Martinez’s request to extend his pretrial motion deadline to Nov. 25.

Winters’ sentencing is scheduled for Feb. 6.

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chuck at 724-226-4711, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.