Plum School District officials proclaim high school graduation issue resolved |
Valley News Dispatch

Plum School District officials proclaim high school graduation issue resolved

Michael DiVittorio

Plum School District officials have resolved a graduation issue that could have prevented many seniors from attending commencement.

Graduation is scheduled for 7 p.m. June 6 at the high school, 900 Elicker Road.

The ceremony was originally planned that day, but was bumped to June 10 due to cancellations and snow days.

Multiple students went before the school board earlier this year to voice concerns about not attending the ceremony with their fellow classmates due to family trips and other commitments, and lobbied for an earlier date.

Superintendent Brendan Hyland said officials sat down with students within the past month, and were able to change the schedule.

“The students did an excellent and admirable job advocating for themselves,” Hyland said. “We indicated that we are a student centered organization. I think we demonstrated that by working with our students for a solution that works for them and also adheres to the law. I want these kids to have a win. They deserve it.”

The law requires students receive 180 days of instruction. Waivers are possible through the state Department of Education.

The district’s calendar still lists June 10 as the last day of school and June 7 as a snow makeup day.

More information about graduation is available at

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Michael at 412-871-2367, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.