Plum School District, teachers union reach tentative new deal, avoid strike |
Valley News Dispatch

Plum School District, teachers union reach tentative new deal, avoid strike

Michael DiVittorio

Plum School District and teachers union officials have reached a tentative agreement on a new six-year contract.

Details of the new contract may be released once both parties have formally signed off on it.

Plum Borough Education Association members are expected to vote on the agreement Thursday. The school board will have a special meeting April 9 to vote on the contract shortly before its workshop meeting.

Attorney Michael Brungo was the district’s chief negotiator. David Vitula negotiated on behalf of the union.

“Mr. Vitula did an excellent job advocating for our teachers with an eye on what was in the best interest for our students,” Superintendent Brendan Hyland said. “I am proud of the district team, including Mr. Brungo, who did the same. Hopefully, we will have a six-year contract where we can get down to the business of exceptionally preparing our students for success.”

The last four-year contract expired June 30. The district let go of multiple staffers due to budget cuts ahead of the 2018-19 school year.

The union in November authorized its negotiation team to call for a strike if necessary. It also sought state-appointed mediation.

A mediator was appointed and a strike was avoided. Union membership is around 260.

Messages to union President David Gray were not immediately returned.

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Michael at 412-871-2367, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.